Circumcision Can Prevent HIV
In December 2006, the National Institutes of Health halted two clinical trials of male circumcision after an early review of the data showed that the procedure dramatically reduced transmission of HIV. Early this year, the details of those studies were published in the Lancet: In the two randomized trials, which included 7,780 HIV-negative men in Rakai, Uganda, and Kisumu, Kenya, researchers found that medically circumcised men were at least 51% less likely than uncircumcised men to acquire HIV during sex with women. The editors of the Lancet called the discovery "a new era for HIV prevention." Scientists don't know yet whether male circumcision can also provide protection for female partners — a new study on the hypothesis is forthcoming next year.
The cat
The cat was not able will answer because there was no suffrage last night though there was a telephone of the public opinion poll of the ** newspaper. Apparently, cabinet support rate seems to have divedThe c
ause seems to depend on no problem solving to the payment record of the pension. This problem expresses my opinion it was to have instituted it as what about the future should have misgivings by the bulletin board of "Law toque" of the Internet by it when not having become an object of public concern yet. When whoever becomes a Prime Minister it, this problem won't be solved. Because the record of evidence did not exist ･･･ It was what warned a young how much hourly wage, generation not to pass though it spoke very highly of the grace of the Japanese people generous to such a bureaucracy at that time. Why is the one not solved even if Mr./Ms. Ozawa becomes a prime minister made the judgment material of the cabinet support rate, and people's common senses even are asked. Up to now though it was indifferent over many years ･･･ Environmental problems of the theme aim at a rethinking one national one this time, the entire human race's consideration is purified, and might be a good material by which this problem also asks consideration of Japanese people's common senses if it thinks it is made to receive in the entire universe. This pension joining record already doesn't have the testifying one in the public office. There are a lot of people who annulled it because the obligation is not put on keeping though it is only a delivered receipt with the people. Judging from the rate of paying completely of the pension, no horsefly though it is unquestionable if the pension is provided for all pension subscribers assuming that it joins the pension because of the beginning. Then, it can do nothing but judge by the rating of the person who has the nonpayment period of the pension. Does the rating neatly pay other social insurances?How about the electric water service fee?Is the tax a person who is paying in the time limit?How about the reception fee of NHK?Person's rating can do nothing but be asked to the people.
